Effectiveness of Communication in an Organizational Environment Essay

Effectiveness of intercourse in an Organizational Environment - Essay ExampleThe opposite group was allowed to ask questions and certify its have views regarding the predilection presented by the other group. I was also a part of one of the groups. Observation ab initio the instructor explained the theoretical concepts of the topic to us. We were told roughly the factor that add to the effectiveness of inter-personal confabulation which included completeness, conciseness, concreteness and clarity. Afterwards, we were told about the factors that could cause hindrance in the process of communication. The hindrances included physical noise present in the milieu of the place where communication takes place, psychological noise that keeps a person from processing the information being communication due to a distraction or emotional situation and the difference between the social and schoolman background of the individuals communicating. After the explanation of the theoretical c oncepts, we were told about trustworthy real life scenarios that occur in organizations and about the flow of communication in the organizations. We were told that the hierarchical structures of organizations impair the free flow of communication in organizations and they cause delay in the delivery of information. ... wed in this scenario is that, the subordinate will communicate to his theater director who will communicate the information to the relevant person in line with his position in the respective(prenominal) department and then the information would finally be communicated to the concerned individual. In this extensive flow, sometimes certain essential facts are lost from the information and a distorted version of the message is delivered. After the teacher was satisfied that both the groups had understood enough concepts to come up with ideas, the discussion started and each group was told to present an idea to improve the flow of communication in an organization along with sufficient justification. The members of both the groups started enumeration out the ideas among themselves. In my group, only a couple of students were taking part actively. One of them said that organizations should learn hierarchical structures and adopt a flat structure. Another group member said that this idea was visionary and organizations will not be able to adopt a completely flat structure. He cognizant that the organizations should introduce such a policy that allows all the employees to communicate to every person at any level of the organization without going through a specified channel. He also added that an open admission policy could be an example of such a policy. Other group members nodded at this idea and this showed that they preferred this idea over the idea presented before. However the group member who presented the first idea held the view that this idea was not that effective as the flow of communication in an organization cannot be brought unless a dramatic change is not made in the authorities and responsibilities of the personnel of the organization. Other group members weighed the pros and cons of